您应该实现“浅”树结构,并在需要时使用引用。 这意味着对于您应用中的大多数情况,您应该按原样使用该对象,确保它包含“基本数据”(在“聊天标题”下面的示例中),以及“更多”信息的键(在例如,“成员”的键。
来自firebase docs( https://firebase.google.com/docs/database/web/structure-data ):
的 坏 强>
{ // This is a poorly nested data architecture, because iterating the children // of the "chats" node to get a list of conversation titles requires // potentially downloading hundreds of megabytes of messages "chats": { "one": { "title": "Historical Tech Pioneers", "messages": { "m1": { "sender": "ghopper", "message": "Relay malfunction found. Cause: moth." }, "m2": { ... }, // a very long list of messages } }, "two": { ... } } }
的 好 强>
{ // Chats contains only meta info about each conversation // stored under the chats's unique ID "chats": { "one": { "title": "Historical Tech Pioneers", "lastMessage": "ghopper: Relay malfunction found. Cause: moth.", "timestamp": 1459361875666 }, "two": { ... }, "three": { ... } }, // Conversation members are easily accessible // and stored by chat conversation ID "members": { // we'll talk about indices like this below "one": { "ghopper": true, "alovelace": true, "eclarke": true }, "two": { ... }, "three": { ... } }, // Messages are separate from data we may want to iterate quickly // but still easily paginated and queried, and organized by chat // conversation ID "messages": { "one": { "m1": { "name": "eclarke", "message": "The relay seems to be malfunctioning.", "timestamp": 1459361875337 }, "m2": { ... }, "m3": { ... } }, "two": { ... }, "three": { ... } } }